Times New Roman>; mso-hansi-font-family: >Times New Roman>">阳东县劳动保障局:
Times New Roman>; mso-hansi-font-family: >Times New Roman>">你局《关于蔡丽好工伤认定是否超过时效的请示》(Times New Roman>; mso-hansi-font-family: >Times New Roman>">东劳社呈[2004]04Times New Roman>; mso-hansi-font-family: >Times New Roman>">号)Times New Roman>; mso-hansi-font-family: >Times New Roman>">收悉。现答复如下:
Times New Roman>; mso-hansi-font-family: >Times New Roman>">根据原劳动部办公厅《关于处理工伤争议有关问题的复函》(Times New Roman>; mso-hansi-font-family: >Times New Roman>">劳办发[1996]28Times New Roman>; mso-hansi-font-family: >Times New Roman>">号)Times New Roman>; mso-hansi-font-family: >Times New Roman>">第一条规定,劳动行政部门对受理劳动者工伤申诉没有时效规定,即劳动者工伤后意识到权益受到侵害的,就可以向劳动行政部门申请工伤认定,并不受时间的限制。国务院《工伤保险条例》第十七条将工伤认定申请最长时效规定为1Times New Roman>; mso-hansi-font-family: >Times New Roman>">年,但该条例生效时间为2004Times New Roman>; mso-hansi-font-family: >Times New Roman>">年1Times New Roman>; mso-hansi-font-family: >Times New Roman>">月1Times New Roman>; mso-hansi-font-family: >Times New Roman>">日Times New Roman>; mso-hansi-font-family: >Times New Roman>">,不应影响在此之前做出的决定。所以,我们认为你们当时受理蔡丽好的工伤认定申请是在合法的时效之内。
Times New Roman>; mso-hansi-font-family: >Times New Roman>">二Times New Roman>">○○Times New Roman>; mso-hansi-font-family: >Times New Roman>">四年五月十三日