Supposeyouareinthepositionofaparent.Wouldyouallowyourchildrentoreadanybookorseeanyfilmtheywantedtowithoutfirstcheckingitscontentorfindingoutwhetheritissuitableforthem?Ifyouranswertothequestionis"yes,"thenyouareeitherextremelypermissiveorjustplainirresponsible.Ifyouransweris"no,"thenyouareexercisingyourrightasaparenttoprotectyourchildrenfromwhatyouconsidertobeundesirableinfluences.Inotherwords,byactingasacensoryourself,youareadmittingthatthereisastrongcaseforcensorship.
Perhapsyouwillsaythatchildrenneedprotectionanditistheparents'responsibilitytoprovideit.Butwithadults,itisanotherthing.Ofcoursemanyadultscandecidewhatisgoodandwhatisbad,butnotallofthemcandoso.Censorshipisforthegoodofsocietyasawhole.Justimaginewhatchaostherewouldbeifwelivedinasocietywithoutlaws!Likethelaw,censorshipcontributestothecommongood.
Moreover,whendiscussingcensorship,weshouldnotconfineourattentiontogreatmasterpiecesofgenuineart,butshouldconsiderthevastnumbersofpublicationsandfilmswhichmakeupthebulkoftheentertainmentindustry.Whencensorshiplawsarerelaxed,unscrupulouspeoplearegivenalicencetoproducevirtuallyanythinginthenameof"art",butactuallyareveryfarfrombeingworksofart.Thereisatendencytoequate"artistic"with"pornographic".Thevastmarketforpornographywouldrapidlybeexploited.Oneofthegreatthingsthatcensorshipdoesistopreventcertainpeoplefrommakingfatprofitsbycorruptingthemindsofothers.
CET6六级作文内容分析：
本文是一篇议论文。作者从多方面、多角度主张出版物应受审查,第一段从儿童的角度辩论,第二段从成人和全社会角度辩论,第三段从区分真假艺术作品角度辩论。全文议论文体表现强烈,书面语气息很浓。
CET6六级作文万能句型：
plain/completelyirresponsible极不负责
undesirableinfluences不良影响
Itisanotherthingwithadults对成年人来说则是另一回事
corruptthemindsofothers腐蚀别人的思想
confineourattentionto注意力局限于
masterpiecesofgenuineart真正的艺术杰作
thebulkofpublications大量出版物
U633687664
U582121265
