Some people think that health care should be free to all people, while others think that people should pay their own medical expenses. Discuss these two views and give their own opinions. Analyze the sample answers.
Very few people can be immune to diseases, diseases or certain accidents, which makes health care play an important role in everyone's life Yes, I think it will cause some problems if it is provided free of charge. Some people advocate that citizens should have free access to health care resources, because the basic quality of life can be guaranteed. Those who are poor or come from poor families, if they have few opportunities, their medical expenses are very high, which means that their health problems can be alleviated or solved through a lot of financial support, so that the public can enjoy a healthier life, Improve their quality of life.
Opponents believe that if free medical services are provided, it is likely to have some adverse consequences. Free medical care means a lot of investment, which may lead to financial imbalance and shortage in other important areas of everyone's daily life, and the basic interests of taxpayers may be damaged by personal burden. I do not agree that the proposal of free medical care should be from the perspective of doctors In view of this, the income of doctors may drop sharply due to the lack of salary sources.
As a result, few people are willing to choose doctors as their profession because of their poor career prospects and can provide first-class medical services.
中文翻译：
一些人认为医疗保健应该对所有人免费，而另一些人认为人们应该自己支付医疗费用讨论这两种观点并给出自己的观点分析样本答案很少有人能对疾病、疾病或某些意外事件免疫，这使得医疗保健必须给他们一个保证卫生保健在每个人的生活中都起着举足轻重的作用，我认为，如果免费提供，会引发一些问题。有些人主张公民应该免费获得医疗保健资源，因为基本生活质量是可以保证的，那些贫困或来自贫困家庭的人，如果他们的机会可能很少他们的医疗费用很高，这意味着他们的健康问题可以通过大量的财政支持得到缓解或解决，因此，公众可以享受更健康的生活，提高他们的生活质量。反对者认为，如果提供免费医疗服务，很可能会产生一些不良后果免费医疗意味着大量的投资，这可能会导致涉及到每个人日常生活的其他重要领域的财政不平衡和短缺，纳税人的基本利益可能会因为个人负担而受到损害，我不赞成免费医疗的提议应该从医生的角度来考虑，医生的收入可能会因为工资来源少而急剧下降，从而导致很少有人因为职业前景黯淡而愿意选择医生作为自己的职业，并且可以提供一流的医疗服务。
